If you are just getting into lock picking and are looking at snagging a transparent lock for your first practice lock, you probably aren't going to like what I’m about to say – but it is a truth that is so important that it can very well determine your success or failure at learning lock picking.
This truth is...
The best transparent training lock is no transparent lock at all.
Using any sort of clear and plastic lock to develop and practice your picking skills is going to do more harm than good for two main reasons:
Now before we dive a little deeper into why these locks can hinder your ability to learn and progress your lock picking skills, I do want to clarify that these transparent locks do have two very useful purposes.
They are excellent visual aids for understanding and explaining how locks and lock picking work and they are great at demonstrating how particular tools affect internal components of the lock.
However, beyond simple demonstration, these locks should never be used for practice.
If you are looking for your first practice lock, be sure to check out this progressive guide on the best locks to learn lock picking.
With that, let's jump a little deeper into the reasons why these acrylic and transparent locks can be so damaging to those who are just getting into lock picking!
You may also like to read:
The first danger of transparent locks is that they completely distort our understanding of the feedback – the sensory outputs like vibrations or clicks – that the lock gives us.
In the simplest of nutshells, lock picking is nothing more than developing and recognizing patterns.
The patterns in lock picking are essentially our understanding of how a lock is picked and how feedback and cues fall into that process.
When we first learn how to pick a lock, we have no experience nor patterns to base our actions on. We poke and prod within the lock with no idea what is going on.
However, as we poke around, we begin to sense feedback and while we understand that this feedback means something and in some strange way is telling us what to do next, we don't yet have the experience to give it proper meaning or context.
But as we continue to practice and continue to sense that feedback, we slowly begin to understand its meaning and give it context. We begin to understand what a stiff pin feels like and what it means, what a click feels like and what it means, or what a floppy pin feels like and what it means.
Finally, we begin to arrange this feedback into patterns, and rather than simply experiencing the feedback, we intentionally search for specific feedback – once we understand the pattern of picking a lock, we understand what feedback we are looking for next.
Now if this entire process of understanding feedback is distorted, if we develop our patterns upon information that we can’t use, the whole process falls apart.
This is the danger of transparent locks. They disrupt the learning process by giving us feedback and developing patterns based upon that feedback that can’t be applied to real locks.
This disruption comes in two forms: visual feedback and odd feedback.
Lock picking is not a visual craft and sight is an extremely dominant sense that quashes all other senses.
When we train ourselves to recognize the feedback and signals a lock gives us using visual support, we absolutely distort our understanding of that feedback and those cues. Our understanding has been tainted and in a way become dependant upon visual feedback.
While this isn't the end of the world, it will force us to take a step back and develop a new and more accurate understanding of what the feedback is and what it feels like without visual corruption.
It is always easier to learn things right the first time.
Real lock and plastic locks are different in many ways including the material they are made of, how they are constructed, and the tolerances built into them.
As a result, the feedback that we get from these locks – such as the friction of lifting a binding pin, the vibrative and haptic click of setting a pin, or even the feeling of tensioning the core – is different between the two.
Starting with a plastic lock is likely going to cause you some confusion and even frustration because when you transfer to a real lock, things are going to feel different.
This setback and frustration are sometimes so great, it causes many new pickers to quit picking altogether.
Every lock is different and every lock is a puzzle. Thus every lock is a different puzzle. The more time you spend solving that “one” particular puzzle, the less that puzzle becomes about utilizing the skills it initially took to solve it the first few times.
It instead becomes something very dangerous.
It becomes a mindless sequence of motions that, not only, no longer requires much skill, but also something that begins to numb you to the feedback the lock is providing. When you can pick a lock through memorization, your brain will stop interpreting any feedback that isn’t in coherence with how that lock has been picked before.
Picking that lock is no longer about listening to what the lock has to say and more about waiting for it to say what you want to hear.
Furthermore, if we spend time picking a lock visually and then later transition over to picking it without looking or any visual feedback, the damage has already been done – we have already begun to understand how to pick that particular lock.
We have wasted the lessons that particular lock had to teach us by picking it using feedback that can't be applied to real locks!
Furthermore, we have deprived ourselves of developing a mental map – the picture that we paint in our mind's eye of where we are in the lock, what we have done, and what is left to do – and even more damaging, denied ourselves the ability to establish a baseline understanding of haptic and sensual feedback.